35% of CryptoLocker victims pay up

2014-03-04

Helen Martin

Virus Bulletin, UK
Editor: Helen Martin

Abstract

Research suggests ransomware is more prevalent than previously thought.


Around 35% of people whose machines are infected by the CryptoLocker ransomware end up agreeing to pay a ransom of around £300 to recover their files, according to researchers from the University of Kent.

CryptoLocker has become known as the unfortunate crypto success story of 2013. While stories about broken cryptography implementations made the headlines throughout the second half of the year, no one has yet been able to find a serious weakness in this piece of ransomware. Victims who find their files encrypted by CryptoLocker and who do not have a back-up of their files are forced either to pay the ransom, or to consider the files lost forever.

Researchers at the University of Kent’s Research Centre for Cyber Security surveyed 1,500 adults in the UK, asking them eight cybercrime and security-related questions. They discovered that ransomware represents one in every 30 malware cases – which is higher than previous estimates.

The researchers questioned 48 people who had been affected by CryptoLocker – of whom, 17 said they paid the ransom and 31 said they did not.

Although CryptoLocker has proved a tough case to crack and has caused many a headache for those unfortunate enough to find themselves infected with it, the creators of other pieces of ransomware are, thankfully, not quite as adept. Last month, French researchers Fabien Perigaud and Cedric Pernet uncovered a serious vulnerability in the Bitcrypt ransomware that allowed them to crack the keys used by the malware to encrypt the victim’s files – as a result, they were able to restore the encrypted files. The researchers have made a Python script available so that others can also crack Bitcrypt’s keys and restore their files.

twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

 

Latest articles:

Nexus Android banking botnet – compromising C&C panels and dissecting mobile AppInjects

Aditya Sood & Rohit Bansal provide details of a security vulnerability in the Nexus Android botnet C&C panel that was exploited to compromise the C&C panel in order to gather threat intelligence, and present a model of mobile AppInjects.

Cryptojacking on the fly: TeamTNT using NVIDIA drivers to mine cryptocurrency

TeamTNT is known for attacking insecure and vulnerable Kubernetes deployments in order to infiltrate organizations’ dedicated environments and transform them into attack launchpads. In this article Aditya Sood presents a new module introduced by…

Collector-stealer: a Russian origin credential and information extractor

Collector-stealer, a piece of malware of Russian origin, is heavily used on the Internet to exfiltrate sensitive data from end-user systems and store it in its C&C panels. In this article, researchers Aditya K Sood and Rohit Chaturvedi present a 360…

Fighting Fire with Fire

In 1989, Joe Wells encountered his first virus: Jerusalem. He disassembled the virus, and from that moment onward, was intrigued by the properties of these small pieces of self-replicating code. Joe Wells was an expert on computer viruses, was partly…

Run your malicious VBA macros anywhere!

Kurt Natvig wanted to understand whether it’s possible to recompile VBA macros to another language, which could then easily be ‘run’ on any gateway, thus revealing a sample’s true nature in a safe manner. In this article he explains how he recompiled…


Bulletin Archive

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.