Panel discussion: The value (and danger) of offensive security research

Offensive security research, even among white-hat hackers, has helped the community to 'think like attackers' and enhance defensive technologies. However, this research comes at a significant cost and there are new arguments emerging that the work of the benevolent security research community is driving down the cost and complexities of attacks against computer networks.

There is a growing sentiment (see link ) that the intellectual pursuit of exploiting software vulnerabilities and defeating mitigations is simply providing a roadmap for the bad guys to break into computer systems.

During this panel discussion, we will look at the argument from both sides and help the audience find the value and dangers of offensive computer research.

  • Adrian Stone, RIM
  • Josh Shaul, Application Security Inc.
  • Matt Watchinski, Sourcefire
  • Chaired by: Ryan Naraine, ZDNet



twitter.png
fb.png
linkedin.png
hackernews.png
reddit.png

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.