Does it matter if my banking password is 'Prague'?

Posted by   Virus Bulletin on   Apr 16, 2015

Users do choose weak passwords, but they aren't as big a problem as we think.

This week, I spent a few days at the Cyber Security Summit Financial Services conference in Prague, discussing the state of security with people who work in the financial sector.

Unsurprisingly, a common topic of discussion was that group of individuals who cause headaches for all security engineers: users. They show a surprising inventiveness when it comes to doing things wrong and are often willing to go so far as to take a photograph of their list of TAN codes to help crooks circumvent two-factor authentication. On top of that, they have a tendency to choose very weak passwords.

But does the latter actually matter? Leading a discussion among the audience, I asked whether it would introduce a significant risk if I were to choose the simple password 'Prague' for my online banking. Someone working in security at a large bank said that, while he had seen many cases of financial fraud and theft, he had never seen a case where a weak password was an issue. Others in the room confirmed this.

Indeed, any decent online banking system allows a very limited number of 'guesses' when attempting to log in, thus meaning that only the most obvious password choices ('password', '123456' or one's surname) will give an attacker a reasonable chance of getting in. And even if an attacker does get in, two-factor authentication should prevent them from doing any actual harm.

Banking malware has become pretty inventive at bypassing two-factor authentication — and users are often willing to provide a helping hand. But password security doesn't make a difference here: entering a password on a phishing site is no safer if the password is strong.

When we talk about the ease of cracking passwords, we consider the second-to-worst case scenario where an adversary gets hold of a file of passwords, hashed using a single iteration of MD5 without the use of salt. (Ironically, in the worst case scenario, where an adversary gets hold of a file of plain text passwords, the strength of these passwords is irrelevant.)

It is mostly this scenario that makes us tell people to choose strong passwords — as we should continue to do. But in reality, using slow hashing algorithms combined with a salt is increasingly common. Moreover, an adversary who is so deep into a bank's system they can obtain the password file, is likely to be able to do so much harm that it makes the strength of all passwords yet again irrelevant.

Security professionals have a tendency to suggest the state of security is really bad. In many cases this is indeed the case. But the problem with password security isn't as big a problem as it is often suggested.

Posted on 16 April 2015 by Martijn Grooten


Latest posts:

VB2019 paper: The push from fiction for increased surveillance, and its impact on privacy

In a paper presented at VB2019 in London, researchers Miriam Cihodariu (Heimdal Security) and Andrei Bogdan Brad (Code4Romania) looked at how surveillance is represented in fiction and how these representations are shaping people's attitudes to…

VB2019 paper: Oops! It happened again!

At VB2019 in London industry veterans Righard Zwienenberg and Eddy Willems took a detailed look at the relationship between past and current cyber threats. Today, we publish both their paper and the recording of their presentation.

Job vacancy at VB: Security Evangelist

Virus Bulletin is recruiting for a person to be the public face of the company

VB2019 video: Thwarting Emotet email conversation thread hijacking with clustering

At VB2019 in London, ZEROSPAM researchers Pierre-Luc Vaudry and Olivier Coutu discussed how email clustering could be used to detect malicious Emotet emails that hijacked existing email threads. Today we publish the recording of their presentation.

VB2019 paper: A vine climbing over the Great Firewall: a long-term attack against China

Today we publish a VB2019 paper from Lion Gu and Bowen Pan from the Qi An Xin Threat Intelligence Center in China in which they analysed an APT group dubbed 'Poison Vine', which targeted various government, military and research institutes in China.

We have placed cookies on your device in order to improve the functionality of this site, as outlined in our cookies policy. However, you may delete and block all cookies from this site and your use of the site will be unaffected. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to Virus Bulletin's use of data as outlined in our privacy policy.